Securing Power and Control: The Problem and Attack Vectors

August 15, 2016 Chad Lloyd

Electricity is taken for granted. Lights illuminate when we flip a switch. Turn up the thermostat and the house warms up. In the recent past a power failure could mean family time gathered around candles and a fun board game. Today, power failures are much more than a nuisance. No lights. No heat. No air conditioning. No business.

Power failures have long been a result of hardware failure. Blown transformers or opened circuit breakers, possibly victims of storms. These failures still occur and are accompanied by new problems thanks to the increasing reliance on network-connected devices in the power system. These devices can be hacked, sometimes with remote control taking place right in front of an operator. In one case, multiple circuit breakers were opened and entire substations were taken offline during a cold winter day.

This post will focus on the problem, potential attack methods, and some solutions to secure critical and noncritical infrastructure.

Power and control systems present tempting targets for hackers. Motives include curiosity, money, political statements (hacktivism) and terrorism. The tools and education necessary to perform an attack are only an Internet search away. The truth is that power and control systems remain vulnerable. These vulnerabilities are typically exploited via one of three attack vectors: people, technology and operations.

People are often the most vulnerable of the attack vectors due to social engineering. An act of psychological manipulation, social engineering tricks people into revealing critical information or performing tasks without intentional compliance. It’s a technique preferred by some of the most famous hackers and is commonly used as an entry point for an attack.

The technology vector includes any device or medium that is used to carry out an attack. This includes wireless or wired networks, computers (either a target computer or an attacker’s computer), USB flash drives and networking devices (such as firewalls and routers). A carefully crafted attack reportedly delivered via USB flash drive crippled a complex industrial control system. A popular example of this idea is to drop a USB flash drive in a parking lot where it will likely be picked up by a curious employee of the target company. The curious employee then plugs the USB flash drive into their company computer (to see what it contains) and the payload is delivered to their machine and other machines on the network. An analogous, pre-cyber example was used in WWII to successfully plant disinformation about war plans.

The final attack vector is operations. This vector focuses on the policies in place by the organization and the enforcement (or leniency) of those policies. Password management is an example. Policies are written to prevent users from using simple passwords (like “123456” or “password” or another from the list of worst passwords). Attackers will detect if these policies are enforced or are considered mere suggestions.

At this point, you may be convinced that we’re all doomed. Fear not, though. There are solutions to address most of these issues. Look for some of these solutions in my second post in this series. In the meantime, find out more by reading our white paper “Securing Power Monitoring and Control Systems”.

The post Securing Power and Control: The Problem and Attack Vectors appeared first on Schneider Electric Blog.

Previous Article
Daytona International Gets Smart About Panelboards
Daytona International Gets Smart About Panelboards

It’s home to what’s been called the Great American Race for years but Daytona International Speedway handle...

Next Article
Battle of the UPSs
Battle of the UPSs

A quantitative showdown between DRUPs and Static UPSs Diesel rotary UPS (DRUPS) systems have found a niche ...

Need power protection for YOUR home office or living room?

Find Your UPS

Become a Data Center Expert - get the latest content before anyone else

Thank you
Error - something went wrong!